When producing our horror piece we needed to present the public with our intial ideas to gauge the level of interest in different demographics, this was done in order to see if our intitial projections of the populations interest in relation to their income type were accurate. We did this by sending out a questionnaire to a random sample of the populace. The questionnaire was as follows and relied on a yes/no structure apart from the final two questions which were structured as open questions as opposed to the first six which were closed.
Does the film represent the genre well?
Have we used a variety of camerawork?
Does the music suit the genre?
Is there a variety of characters used?
Does the title sequence give you enough information?
Have we edited the footage well?
What could we improve?
What have we done well?
A common way of grouping audiences together is by organising them in order of income:
A: Top management, bankers, lawyers, doctors and other highly salaried professionals.
B: Middle management, teachers, many 'creatives' eg graphic designers etc.
C1: Office supervisors, junior managers, nurses, specialist clerical staff etc
C2: Skilled workers, tradepersons (white collar)
D: Semi-skilled and unskilled manual workers (blue collar)
E: Unemployed, students, pensioners, casual workers.
The results that I will base my response from will largely emanate from the focus group of the type E demographic, this group consisted of 10 individuals aged 15-21 with a 6/4 split in favour of males. The group is based in Cambridgeshire and are of mainly caucasian race.
Question 1 - Does the film represent the genre well?
This closed question was used to determine the response the film received from a typical horror fan, if it was a generally positive response the film would be cleared to go ahead as it has achieved it's primary objective in associating itself to it's main target audience. From our results we saw that 60% of members in the income bracket E thought the film did display the genre well, and being a low budget production this demographic grouping would be the ideal audience to target the film to, because of this we fealt the ideas we had portrayed in the first draft were solid and typical of the genre albeit with room for improvement in order to catch the remaining 40% of the target market in the completed version.
Question 2 - Have we used a variety of camerawork?
By securing a definitive response to this question we would be able to establish the level of technical prowess we have demonstrated in the pre production section of our piece, as this will utlimately be a contributing factor to the watchability of our film, with a wide variety of camera shots connoting easier viewing and higher interest levels in the audience. Having identified the ideal target audience as bracket E we continued to focus on the results trend this group produced in particular, with 60% agreeing that we had indeed utilized a variety of shots in our production. Perhaps if given more time we would of been able to refilm some scenes to utilize more shot types and satisfy the remaining 40% who voted negatively on this particular apsect of our film.
Question 3 - Does the music suit the genre?
At the time of viewing our first draft the piece was vacant of a musical score for the title sequence which considerably lessened the impact the scene was able to achieve, as music is as important if not more so than other elements of a film, memorable film scores include "Jaws" and "The Lord of The Rings", and so at the first time of asking only the news report had any music attached and because of this only 20% of the target audience fealt that the music suited the genre. It was at this point that we then presented the following music to the audience that would be intended for the title sequence.
After sampling the track the response drastically changed, with 100% of the focus group agreeing that the music was typical of the genre creating a haunting and creepy atmosphere, there was still a slight concern over the jingle that introduces the news report, however this was a minor issue and was agreed that it did not subtract from the experience and created an unusual contrast. I am confident therefore that the finished version of our film will be enjoyable and technically successful in it's deployment of music.
Question 4 - Is there a variety of characters used?
When creating the concept for the film it was important that we managed to accurately portray a wide range of characters that fit certain social stereotypes while at the same time making them feel believable and relatable to the audience. The characters present in our intial 2 minutes of footage were: The psychologically troubled killer, Strict mother, Rebellious child, Worried friend and Inconsiderate Teenager. The characters selected for use in the opening were not only of varying temperaments but also of a wide age range, while doing this we also managed to establish a cast of characters that while dynamic and varied did lean towards the younger age groups and thus placed itself better in terms of relatability to the target audience. Seeing this the target group responded with an 80% return in favour of a wide range of characters being used.
Question 5 - Does the Title sequence give you enough information?
When creating our title sequence we knew we wanted to provide our audience with tiny clues as to the nature of our production and the killer's incentive's and some of his backstory, while at the same time we also wanted to conceal many elements for later revelations as is typical of the psychological thriller. The feedback we received showed that 40% of the target market responded negatively to the amount of information present in the first draft of the production. This shows that we have sucessfully accomplished half of our target by allowing it to be mysterious however in order to open it up to the wider viewing audience we will need to include a few more subtle clues in the revised opening, this will be achieved by taking out or shortening some of the less important shots and inserting some of the edgier shots that were initially left out as they were deemed to be too revealing.
Question 6 - Have we edited the footage well?
Although only in the early stages of post-production it was important that we received an unbiased view on the editing techniques we had begun to employ on our raw footage at this stage, so as to rectify any errors or parts not in keeping with the theme we wished to incorporate. The response was largely positive with 3 out of 5 agreeing with the editing approach that had been taken, in particular the way the card writing and balloon shots had been edited. Constructive criticism was also received with some saying a few of the shots could be shortened.
Question 7 - What could we improve?
This open question provided the means for the target group to voice any issues with the opening that the previous 6 questions did not cover, by doing this we were able to gather more specific areas for improvement, be it a camera shot, piece of editing, or sound clip etcetera. Among the criticisms were the feeling that the final scene with the hand should be removed, the title animation needed to be shortened and the scene with the mother and child should be cut or removed completely as they fealt these particular elements only caused congestion in the viewing experience while adding very little to the plot.
Question 8 - What have we done well?
This final question was designed with the emphasis to help myself and Kelly in the second phase of editing by allowing the focus group to single out elements of the piece they particularly liked that shouldn't be removed in further editing. The responses generally praised the execution of the card writing shot, the lighting effect used on the balloon/calendar shot, and the creepy atmosphere created by our title sequence. As a result of this the previously mentioned shots will remain largely untouched in the next phase of editing.
Demographic
With the largely positive response we got from the demographic type E we have established that this particular group of individuals will become our core audience as they're reaction to the material was very promising. Bearing this in mind, the film will now focus it's efforts into incorporating as many elements that this particular demographic associate positively to in the horror genre, in order to enhance the reception the film will have with this group. This will include use of classic horror conventions/rules and enable the audiences expectations to ultimately be fulfilled or shattered by the piece.
Psychographic
In order to further promote interest in the film we would have to make use of elements of everyday life that best synergise with the chosen demographical target.The full length feauture would therefore utilise product placements, popular culture and stereotypical music archetypes to better synchronize it's ideas to the target audience. Another way to enhance the connection the film makes with it's audience is by making the events in the film seem realistic and believeable therefore augmenting the terror caused by said events.